|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An Electronic Journal for the
Exchange of Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
on Current Research, Publications
and Productions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concerning |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Wilde and His Worlds
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue no 51 : March 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We have chosen
as this issue’s frontispiece the plaque unveiled by Gyles Brandreth on the Langham Hotel, 19th March 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EDITORIAL PAGE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Navigating THE OSCHOLARS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since November 2007 this page has been
split into two sections. SECTION I
contains our Editorial, short pieces that we hope will interest readers, and
innovations. SECTION II is a Guide or
site-map to what will be found on other pages of THE
OSCHOLARS with explanatory
notes and links to those pages (formerly to be found on the Editorial
page). Each section is prefaced by a
Table of Contents with hyper links to the Contents themselves. |
Clicking |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE OSCHOLARS
is composed in Bookman Old Style, chiefly
10 point. You can adjust the size by
using the text size command (or zoom) in the View menu of your browser,
Internet Explorer being recommended; or on the taskbar. We do not usually publish e-mail addresses
in full but the sign @ will bring up an e-mail form. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nothing in THE
OSCHOLARS © is copyright to the
Journal save its name (although it may be to individual contributors) unless
indicated by ©, and the usual etiquette of attribution will doubtless be
observed. Please feel free to download
it, re-format it, print it, store it electronically whole or in part, copy
and paste parts of it, and (of course) forward it to colleagues. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As usual, names emboldened in the text are those of subscribers to THE OSCHOLARS, who may be contacted through oscholars@gmail.com. Text in blue can be clicked for navigation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEWS FROM THE EDITOR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Oscar Wilde Centenary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The weekend of 18th/19th July 2009 marked
the centenary of the transfer of Wilde’s remains from Bagneux cemetery to
Père Lachaise. The Société Oscar Wilde
en France arranged appropriate commemoration, and an illustrated report
appears here. We also publish ‘To Oscar’, an address
given at the tomb by the niece of the present Marquess of Queensberry,
Caroline de Bendern. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The weather was benign, and the crowd large. Music and dramatic readings were provided by the Compagnie de Oghma; flowers were laid by a number of Societies and by the Mayor of Berneval. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The opportunity was also taken to place
flowers on the grave of Stuart Merrill, Oscar’s friend, who is buried
opposite. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Caroline de Bendern |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Innovations
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our editorial team has seen a
number of losses, as professional or personal circumstances changed. We have, sadly, lost Costanza Vettori, Linda
Wong, Tiffany Perala and Pilvi
Rajmaë. Professor Wong has been
succeeded as Editor for China by Dr
Amy Lee and Tamara Poniatowska
has joined the VISIONS team as Auction House Editor. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Soul of Man under Socialism
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This spring will see the publication of
the fourth of our Special Issues, on Oscar Wilde’s socialism, edited by Anna Vaninskaya. This is the first
anthology devoted to Wilde’s engagement with socialism and anarchism. As with our other Special Issues, new
essays will be welcome for later publication, so this is both an announcement
and a Call for Papers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New content appears on our website nearly
every day, and we announce this and other matters on our ‘yahoo’
subsidiary. The number of our readers
who have joined this has been growing, and it is increasingly our medium for
making announcements in the place of mass mailings, which more and more fall
foul of anti-spam traps either at the sending or |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE OSCHOLARS LIBRARY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FREQUENTING THE SOCIETY OF THE AGED AND WELL-INFORMED:
NEWS, NOTES, QUERIES.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Picture of Dorian Gray
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dublin: One City One Book is a month long celebration each April of a book connected to
Dublin either by content or author. The 2010 choice is The Picture of Dorian Gray.
For the programme see www.dublinonecityonebook.ie.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Wilde Exhibition in
Paris
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Patrick Chambon’s exhibition ‘Oscar Tapi’ opens at the Galerie Plume, 48 rue de Montmorency, on 20th March and runs until 15th May 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On Dandyism To-day
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An exhibition at The Galician Center for
Contemporary Art, Santiago de Compostela, 17 December 2009 – February 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The current condition of image
proposals and the construction of subjectivity by means of appearance are
essential themes of the early 21st century. Co-produced by the Centro Huarte,
the exhibition aims to reveal the concepts and strategies inherited from
Dandyism found in the work and the attitudes of contemporary artists, as well
as the perdurance of the iconography and themes from Dandyist literature. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Wit and the Epigram
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maurice Baring, who continues to teeter
on the edge of greater recognition, was well esteemed as a man of wit
himself. He was also a noted
anthologist, and the following comes from his Have you Anything to Declare? A Note Book with Commentaries. London: William Heinemann n.d. p.256. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elle ne
parlait que par nuances; jamais elle n’a dit un bon mot: c’était quelque
chose de trop exprimé. Les bons mots
se retiennent ; elle ne voulait que plaire et perdre ce qu’elle disait. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talleyrand on his Mother, from Talleyrand by Jacques Sindral. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Talleyrand’s mother as here described
must have possessed the quintessence and the rarest form of true wit: that
wit which is forgotten as soon as it is born, because it is so exquisitely
appropriate to its context, to the time and place at which it is said, and to
all the circumstances which give it birth, that it cannot be torn from them;
and it is here that it differs from epigram.
Epigram is remembered for a time, but if it is merely brilliant
without being profound, it soon has an appearance of tarnished tinsel. Boswell once said: ‘When I complained of
having dined at a splendid table without hearing one sentence of conversation
worthy to be remembered, he (Dr Johnson) said, “There is seldom such
conversation.”’ Whenever Oscar Wilde’s
comedies are revived in modern times, the epigrams in them have mostly an air
of faded tinsel, but the wit that is inherent in the situations, and which is
in fact comedy in action, survives. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The 1890s Online
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 1890s Online is designed to
facilitate the scholarly study of fin-de-siècle culture, based at Ryerson
University. The archive focuses on visual/verbal/aural relations in a decade
significant for its developments in print — book design, typography,
illustration, photography, periodicals, newspapers, posters, playbills and
advertising — as well as for its developments in the performance arts — music
hall, theatre, and the emerging technologies of cinema. In its ideally
envisioned form, The 1890s Online will include the tools for complex searches
and comparisons of the period's images and texts as well as searchable audio
links to its songs, sounds, and speeches. The archive is overseen by an
international editorial board of scholars with expertise in the literature,
art, and culture of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Essays cover Aubrey Beardsley, Ella D'Arcy,
Marion Hepworth Dixon, George Egerton, Kenneth Grahame, Carl Hentschel,
George Moore, Joseph Swan and ‘Other people of the 1890s will populate this
section over time.’ Click here to learn more. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We wrote in
March 2009 that the site seems to be have been stationary for some time, and
this is still true in March 2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
An Oscar Wilde Collection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Dalhousie University Oscar
Wilde Collection has greatly enhanced library holdings of turn-of-the-century
literature. Strong holdings of first and limited editions of Wilde's work are
present. Only five of Wilde's first editions are not included. Of those
missing, there are four known copies of one title, and only two of another.
Later editions, biographies, critical studies, as well as first editions of
contemporaries associated with Wilde–Max Beerbohm, Aubrey Beardsley, Alfred
Douglas, Frank Harris–are well represented. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Highlights of the collection include the
first edition of Poems (1892), an autographed first edition of <The
Picture of Dorian Gray (1891), signed editions of An Ideal Husband
(1899) and The Importance of Being Earnest (1899), first editions of
the popular fables The Happy Prince (1888) and A House of
Pomegranates (1891), and a first edition of The Ballad of Reading Gaol
(1898). The beautifully illustrated
1904 edition of The Harlot's House, the controversial edition of Salome
(1894) (illustrated by Aubrey Beardsley), and a complete run of The Yellow
Book (1894-1897), the journal closely associated with Wilde, illustrate
his "doctrine of aestheticism." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Swinburne
exhibition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"A Swinburne Gallimaufry–Selections
from the John S. Mayfield Papers" in the Special Collections Research
Center, Georgetown University, November 2009 to January 2010. A pdf of the exhibit brochure is available
at http://www.library.georgetown.edu/exhibition/swinburne-gallimaufry-selections-john-s-mayfield-papers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mayfield's collection is an extraordinary one, and was supplemented in one or two instances here by Mark Samuels Lasner, who loaned what must be a holy relic among holy relics–Swinburne's napkin ring. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Neo-Victorianism
and Steampunk
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisa Hager writes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neo-Victorianism generally describes
an approach to contemporary design that looks to the Victorian period for its
inspiration and aesthetics. This interest in nineteenth-century culture has
most recently come to fore in the form of steampunk. This increasingly
popular literary genre and cultural movement looks back to the
nineteenth-century’s Industrial Revolution, i.e. steam engines, and punk,
i.e. play, often with great irony, with its conventions, inventions, and
obsessions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The central theme of steampunk and
neo-Victorianism in general is a consideration of a “What if?” question that
posits a strong connection and blending of the Victorian with current
literature, design, and culture. In the case of steampunk, that question is
directed at the technology of the nineteenth century. As its name suggests,
steampunk is marked by its use of nineteenth-century steam technology in
particular, often with a modern advancement that makes possible a device only
theorized in the Victorian period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Questioning the nineteenth century
since the 1980s, neo-Victorianism and steampunk have been growing sub-genres of science fiction, in
books like Tim Powers’ 1983 The Anubis
Gates, William Gibson and Bruce Sterling's 1990 The Difference Engine, the novels of Sarah Waters, A.S. Bayatt’s Possession (1990), and Philip
Pullman’s His Dark Materials
series, published from 1995-2000.
However, neo-Victorianism and steampunk are much more than literary
genres. They have become cultural phenomena, showing up in almost all areas
of high art and popular culture. Television series such as The Wild, Wild West
(1965-1969) and Sanctuary (currently airing on Sci-Fi) and anime films like the 2004 Steamboy
(Katsuhiro Otomo of Akira fame) and Howl’s Moving Castle (2004) as well as
the Hollywood film The Adventures of Baron Munchausen (1998) are all very
much neo-Victorian and steampunk cultural artifacts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not only do these genres have a clear
presence in mass-market entertainment, but they also lay claim to a thriving
grassroots engineering and production culture that produces steampunked
versions of many modern conveniences, especially computers and weapons, as
well as very vibrant Costume Play (CosPlay) and Science Fiction and Fantasy
Convention (Con) culture. Indeed, one can even find a neo-Victorian island in
the virtual world in the form of Second Life’s Caledon Island. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have created a Google Group to
facilitate scholarly exchange amongst those interested in the field. If you
would like to join the email list, simply send me (lisa.hager@uwc.edu)
an email with your name and the email address that you would like to
subscribe under in the body of your email.
Please feel free to forward this message to other folks who might be
interested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisa Hager, University of Wisconsin –
Waukesha, 1500 North University Drive, Waukesha, WI 53188-2720 Office: 129
Westview lisa.hager@uwc.edu || http://www.lisahager.net/ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Wilde and Richard
Haldane
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One of the hardships Wilde had to undergo
in prison was a visit from the politician-philosopher Richard Haldane,
apparently at the instigation of the Ranee of Sarawak, a friend of the
Wildes. Haldane was nicknamed ‘Schopenhauer’
by his political chief, Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman, and it seems
appropriate enough that Wilde should be visited by some one personifying the
great German pessimist and misanthrope (‘A misanthrope I can understand’,
says Miss Prism, who teaches German). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I used to meet him in the days of his
social success, and, although I had not known him well, was haunted by the
idea of what this highly sensitive man was probably suffering under ordinary
prison treatment. I went to Holloway
gaol, where I knew he was, and asked the Governor to let me see him. The Chaplain called in, and he said I was
glad he had come, for with Wilde he had wholly failed to make any way. I then saw Wilde himself, alone in a
cell. I put my hand on his
prison-dress-clad shoulder and said that I used to know him and that I had
come to say something about himself.
He had not fully used his great literary gift, and the reason was that
he had lived a life of pleasure and had not made any great subject his
own. Now misfortune might prove a
blessing for his career, for he had got a great subject. I would try to get for him books and pen
and ink, and in eighteen months he would be free to produce’. He burst into tears, and promised to make
the attempt. For the books he asked
eagerly, saying that they would only give him The Pilgrim’s Progress, and that this did not satisfy him. He asked for Flaubert’s works. But I said that the dedication by that
author to his advocate, who had successfully defended Flaubert from a change
of indecent publication, made such a book as Madame Bovary unlikely to be
sanctioned. He laughed and became
cheerful. We hit on St Augustine’s
Works and on Mommsen’s History of Rome. These I got for him, and they accompanied
him from prison to prison. I
afterwards visited him at Wandsworth Prison, and persuaded the Home Secretary
to transfer him to Reading Gaol. I saw
Lady Cowper, and with her aid his wife and children were looked after. On his release there came to me anonymously
a volume, The Ballad of Reading Gaol. It was the redemption of his promise to me. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Richard Burdon Haldane: An Autobiography. London: Hodder & Stoughton 1929
pp.166-7. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘For a man to be both a genius and a
Scotsman,’ reflected Wilde in after years, ‘is the very stage for
tragedy’. Is there an echo of the
rather heavy-going Richard Burdon Haldane in the radical M.P. Sir Thomas
Burdon in The Picture of Dorian Gray? |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stephen Koss gives a shorter and slightly
different account. ‘Haldane was a man
of infinite kindnesses. […] It was Haldane who was first to visit Oscar Wilde
in Holloway, bringing him pen, ink and something more diverting to read than The Pilgrim’s Progress.’ Stephen Koss: Lord Haldane, Scapegoat for Liberalism. New York and London: Columbia University
Press 1969 p.11. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lord Ashby and Mary Anderson, in what is
admittedly a more narrowly based study of Haldane, do not mention Wilde at
all. Eric Ashby & Mary Anderson: Portrait
of Haldane at Work on Education.
London: Macmillan 1974. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oscar Wilde and William
Morris : An Uncollected* Letter.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anna
Vaninskaya has drawn our attention to this
passage in Elizabeth Miller's ‘William Morris, Print Culture, and the
Politics of Æstheticism’, Modernism/Modernity 15.3 (2008) p.485. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘Wilde’s interest in Morris’s
theories and in the Commonweal is evidenced by his 1887 note, held in the
Socialist League Archive: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
“Please send Mr. Morris’s tract on
‘Socialism and Art’ to Mr. Oscar Wilde, 16 Tite Street, Chelsea. Also the ‘Commonweal’ for the year beginning
with the November no.” Letter from
Oscar Wilde, 29th October 1887, Socialist League Archive, International Institute
for Social History, Folder 3230. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Not in Holland &
Hart-Davis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
on the Curriculum : Teaching Wilde, Æstheticism and
Decadence.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We are always anxious to publicise the
teaching of Wilde at both second and third level, and welcome news of
Wilde on curricula. Similarly, news of
the other subjects on whom we are publishing (Whistler, Shaw, Ruskin, George
Moore and Vernon Lee) is also welcome.
Andrew Eastham is
developing a study of the teaching of Wilde, which we hope will be helpful to
others who have Wilde on their courses.
Andrew Eastham presented his introductory declaration in our
July/August 2008 issue |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Below is Dr Eastham’s first
essay on the subject. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE CRITIC AS CRITIC
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This issue’s review section contains
reviews by Philip E. Smith on Thomas Wright on Oscar’s
Books; Pascal Aquien on Philip
E. Smith on teaching Wilde; Leonée
Ormond on Puppetcraft’s The Selfish
Giant ; Julia Steck and Andrea
Uebelhard on The Importance of being
Earnest; Richard Pine on
Oliver Parker’s Dorian Gray; James
Bryce on Matthew Bourne’s Dorian Gray;
Elizabeth Carolyn Miller on Shaw; Ruth Livesey on Leela Gandhi on
fin-de-siècle radicalism; Paul Fox
on Decadent Poetry. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Last issue’s
review section contained reviews by Tiffany Perala on The Importance of being Earnest in
Portland, Annabel Rutherford on
Rhonda Garelick on Loïe Fuller, Pilvi
Rajamäe on Kate Macdonald on
John Buchan, Luca Caddia on Daniel Novak on Victorian Photography
& Fiction, Phillippa Bennett on Tom Pinckney on William Morris, Ruth Kinna on H. Gustav Klaus and
Stephen Knight on anarchism, Richard Nate on David Stack on Socialism and
Darwinism. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clicking
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OSCAR WILDE AND THE KINEMATOGRAPH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There still
does not seem to be a release date for Al Pacino’s long-awaited Salomaybe.
Al Pahaps? The cast is as follows: Al
Pacino, Serdar Kalsin (himself/Herod), Kevin Anderson (himself/Jokanaan),
Jessica Chastain, Estelle Parson (Salomé), Roxanne Hart (Herodias), Philipp
Rhys (the young Syrian), Jack Huston (Lord Alfred), Richard Cox (Robert
Ross)… |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A second Wilde film in the making is A Woman of No Importance directed by
Bruce Beresford, with Sienna Miller, Sean Bean, Annette Bening. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Christian
Merlhiot has directed a meditation on Oscar
Wilde’s trial, due for release in Paris in April. For stills from the film and a specially
written statement by M. Merlhiot, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oliver Parker’s Dorian Gray, with Ben
Barnes (Dorian), Colin Firth (Lord Harry), Rebecca Hall (Sibyl Vane), Ben
Chaplin and Rachel Hurd, has failed to gain sympathy. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posters
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This month’s posters were found for us by
Danielle Guérin. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Video of the month
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A full version of Salomé, in English (U.S.), can be
found on Youtube.
Filmed at a performance by (perhaps) students, it comes complete with
the audience’s coughing and a Prophet called Joe Cannan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LETTERS FROM OUR EDITORS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sharon Bickle |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My aim in taking on the ‘Letter from
Australia and New Zealand’ is to give Oscholars an insight into the excellent
research being carried out in the southern hemisphere on Oscar Wilde and
broader fin de siècle studies. This first Letter represents more of an
introduction and a commitment to build a resource that will bring together
information on relevant projects than an accurate snapshot of the work
currently being done across literary, visual and dramatic disciplines
throughout Australia and New Zealand.
Thus, this first Letter begins with an apology–I have pulled together
only a frugal offering–accounted for, I believe, by the overtasked nature of
academia and the need to prioritize time which leads to requests for
information–such as mine–going unremarked, rather than any prevailing lack of
interest in Wilde and his world. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where the Wilde Things Were: Performance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Many Australians are proud of their Irish
ancestry, and Wilde’s plays–and plays about Wilde and his works–feature
frequently on playbills about the country.
In 2009, these included: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An Ideal Husband (dir. Timothy Wallace) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Starlight Theatre Co., Centre Stage
Theatre (Brisbane) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates: 5th-21st February 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer Jason Whittaker writes: “More bodices than a BBC drama, more
bitching and back-stabbing than a Liberal Party lunch; more manners than a
Sunday lunch at grandma's, more pouting than a lemon-eating contest” (Retrieved 1st September 2009 from http://www.australianstage.com.au/reviews/brisbane/an-ideal-husband–starlight-theatre-company-2222.html).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lady Windermere's Fan (dir. Nicholas Papademetriou), |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Darlinghurst Theatre (Sydney) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates: 12th March to 11th April. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Importance of Being Earnest: A Third Year Production (dir. Kevin Jackson) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NIDA, Parade Theatre (Sydney) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dates: 31st March to 4th
April. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
State
Library of Victoria (Melbourne) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Date: 16th
June. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bloom’s day
in 2009 saw a surprising eclipse of the man of the hour by Wilde. The State Library of Victoria offered a
program that included an original theatre piece, Wilde about Joyce, a
seminar on Joyce and Wilde, and a ‘Dinner with Wilde’ (including readings
from Wilde’s plays) at the Celtic Club. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wilde: About Town |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Brisbane boasts a restaurant called
Wilde’s, which nonetheless serves modern Australian cuisine. The restaurant is decorated with lively
quotes–although how Wilde would have addressed a Moreton Bay Bug is anyone’s
guess. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Australian television features a quiz
program called, The Einstein Factor, based on the well-worn formula in
which contestants nominate an area of expertise to be quizzed on. You can access the questions related to
“The Life and Times of Oscar Wilde” at http://www.abc.net.au/einsteinfactor/txt/s2570583.htm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fin
de siècle Research in Australia and New Zealand |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The primary society for information on
nineteenth-century studies in Australia and New Zealand is the Australasian
Victorian Studies Association (AVSA).
AVSA holds an annual conference, often in February, and also supports
a scholarly, refereed journal.
Information on AVSA and AVSJ can be found at http://www.avsa.unimelb.edu.au/index.htm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This year’s AVSA conference was hosted by
the University of Otago (Dunedin, NZ), and was devoted to the theme “The
Victorian Sensorium.” Prof. Sally
Ledger was to have given the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Also of interest, Professor Pamela
Gerrish Nunn of the University of Canterbury (NZ) presented a keynote address
on ‘Alienation, Adoption or Adaptation? Aestheticist Painting by Women’ at
the British Aestheticisms Conference at Université Paul Valéry,
Montpellier on 3rd October (www.esthetismes.org). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In terms of postgraduate work being
carried out in this area: PhD candidate, Molly Duggins of Sydney University,
is currently working on a thesis titled 'Nature, Industry, and Craft: The
Album in Late-19th-Century Visual culture’ based on the 'South Pacific Fern
Album,' a luxurious printed gift book published in Melbourne, c. 1889. In this thesis, she examines the
aestheticisation of nature in album imagery and its colonial undertones, the
exhibitionary nature of the album both in form and content, and the intersection
of and tension between industry and craft as visually manifested in the album
in the last two decades of the 19th century. Agnieszka Zabicka (U. of
Auckland) is currently working on a thesis titled 'Towards a Feminist
Aesthetic: The Fiction of Mona Caird.' Carla Molloy recently completed a
thesis on 'The Art of Popular Fiction: Gender, Authorship and Aesthetics in
the Writing of Ouida' (U. of Canterbury). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The forthcoming edition of the Journal
of Preraphaelite Studies will include a review of Jason Edwards’s book, Alfred
Gilbert’s Aestheticism (Ashgate 2006) by Australian visual arts scholar,
Juliet Peers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Finally, on a personal note, my research
into the fin de siècle collaborative
partnership of Michael Field will find a new home from January 2010 when I
take up a postdoctoral fellowship position at the University of
Queensland. The fellowship project
will take a hybrid approach, combining a much needed biography of the lives
of Bradley, Cooper and Field with an examination of the intersections between
authorship, celebrity, and consumerism in late-nineteenth century British
society. Central to this project will
be the production and consumption of celebrity authorship and the
similarities between Wilde’s manipulation of his popular image as Poet and
Bradley and Cooper’s creation of their own Poet. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Acknowledgement: I would like to gratefully acknowledge the
assistance of Joanne Wilkes, President of AVSA, in compiling information for
this letter. I welcome emails from
Australian/NZ scholars informing me of research currently underway,
forthcoming or recently published for the next letter (sharon.bickle@gmail.com). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lucia Krämer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 January 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dear David |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A happy new year to you and all readers
of THE OSCHOLARS! I’m afraid I haven’t written in quite a while. I had
originally intended to send you a letter reporting on all things Wildean in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Books/Audiobooks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsurprisingly, Wilde was yet again the
most prominent of the British/Irish fin-de-siècle
authors on the German book market in the past eight months. Although a lot of
the secondary literature on Wilde produced in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The publishing houses Grin and VDM
continue bringing out seminar papers and theses by students, some of which
also relate to Wilde and his period, such as |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nerea
Vöing, Der ‘fruchtlose’ Narziss in der
Literatur – die Ablehnung von Generativität. [The
‘Barren’ Narcissus in Literature – The Rejection of Generativity]. Munich:
Grin, 2009. 78 pgs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Berit
Bethke, Die Geburt der Hysterie am Vorabend
des Fin de siècle: Eine kulturhistorische Betrachtung. [The Birth of Hysteria at the Eve of the Fin de siècle: A
Historio-Cultural Analysis]. Munich: Grin, 2009. 60 pgs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Nina
Hrkalovic, Künstlerische
Selbstrepräsentation: Inszenierungsstrategien an der Wende vom 19. zum 20. Jahrhundert. [Artististc
Self-Representation: Strategies of mise-en-scène at the turn from the 19th to
the 20th century]. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag, 2009. 136 pgs. [about strategies
of self-representation by Wilde, Pound, Eliot and V. Woolf] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
From the field of German Studies comes a
student textbook about German literature around 1900, which does, however,
also engage with the background of the development of the various types of
literature at the time in a more general way and therefore is not only
interesting for students of German culture: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Philip Ajouri, Literatur um 1900: Naturalismus, Fin de
Siècle, Expressionismus. [Literature around 1900 : Naturalism, Fin de
siècle, Expressionism]. Berlin : Akdademie Verlag, 2009. 253 pgs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The most interesting new publications in
German concerning Wilde were two books relating to his early German
reception. The first of these titles is a re-publication by the Kessinger
Publication Company of Franz Blei’s seminal text In Memoriam Oscar Wilde, which was the first extensive treatment
of Wilde in German when it first appeared in 1905 and is now again available.
The second text is a thesis on possible influences of Baudelaire and Wilde in
the writings of Viennese journalist Karl Kraus, who was among the first to
write about Wilde in the German language press. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cristiano Bianchi, Karl Kraus als Leser von Charles
Baudelaire und Oscar Wilde. [Karl Kraus as a Reader of Baudelaire and
Wilde]. Innsbruck, Vienna and Munich: Studien Verlag, 2009. 116 pgs. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Apart from Wilde, also Shaw made an
appearance in the German language book market in the autum of 2009, when the
German version of one of Shaw’s public discussions with Chesterton from 1928
was re-printed. The book also contains eight newspaper essays by Chesterton: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gilbert
Keith Chesterton, Sind wir uns einig?
Ein Streitgespräch mit Bernard Shaw nebst einigen Essays. [Do we agree? A Debate between G.K. Chesterton and Bernard Shaw;
with several essays]. Coesfeld: Elsinor, 2009. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Moreover, Stevenson, like Wilde, has
developed into a very stable presence on the German book market, as was
evidenced in the past nine months by a number of new editions of old German
versions of Treasure Island and The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
as well as an English-language edition of An
Inland Voyage, which was, however, published under the title Small Boat Journey on the French Canals
(1904) by the publishing house Salzwasser. The renowned publishing house
Piper has moreover published a new edition of Fanny Stevenson’s diary: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Roslyn
Jolly, ed. Kurs auf die Südsee: Das Tagebuch der Mrs. Robert Louis Stevenson.
Trans. Ilse Rothfuss. München: Piper, 2009. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theatre
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wrote in my introduction that the
summer brought no important new productions of Wilde, at least in Germany.
Wilde continued his career as a writer who is predominantly associated with
light entertainment in new productions of The
Importance of Being Earnest at the Badische Landesbühne in Bruchsal, and
of an adaptation for children of The
Canterville Ghost at the Landesbühne Sachsen-Anhalt in Eisleben. Both
productions were still being played at the end of 2009. Apart from that, Earnest was produced for a limited
number of open-air performances at the Neues Theater in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Things changed when the new theatrical
season began and brought with it a quite remarkable number of Wilde
performances. Among them were amateur productions, such as a version of An Ideal Husband by the
Volksspielbühne Thalia, a |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The one production of Wilde in the past
nine months that made the biggest splash, however, was a new An Ideal Husband at the
3Raum-Anatomietheater in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
While the production of Salome at the Maxim Gorki Theatre in
Berlin, which was abandoned last year due to artistic differences, seems to
have slipped from the schedule altogether, a new production of the play,
which was, after all, the starting point of Wilde’s fame in Germany,
premiered in Stuttgart in October. There seems to be a tendency to see this
particular play of Wilde’s nowadays almost exclusively through the lens of
Strauss’s ubiquitous opera, which is why any production of the original play
deserves particular interest, especially if it tries to be original like the
production at the Kammertheater Stuttgart by Ulrich Rasche. Rasche set the
play on an almost empty black stage made up of hardly more than light and
shadows, with the actors in danger of fading and disappearing into their
black environment. They had to walk on a floor made of styrofoam boards which
constantly threatened to crack under them, making them balance their steps
like on thin ice, and it seemed as if they were in constant danger of
breaking through the floor and disappearing. In keeping with this approach,
Anja Stübinger as Salome delivered her lines with dry indifference, exposing
the role of the figure of Salome as a Leerstelle.
The dance of the seven veils was accordingly replaced by a quick unbuttoning
of Salome’s blouse (by herself) that allowed only the slightest glimpse of
her breast. The refusal to play out the climax and probably best-known
element of the story underlines the necessity of the spectators’ engagement
and of their agency in filling the gaps of Wilde’s play, albeit in the light
of how its best-known aspects are commonly perceived (see e.g. Salome’s
status as a femme fatale). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salome |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kammertheater
Stuttgart, in a version by Ulrich Rasche and Frederik Zeugke |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First night 8th October 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Direction Ulrich Rasche |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cast: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Herodes
Elmar Roloff |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Herodias
Anja Brünglinghaus |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Salome
Nadja Stübiger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Jochanaan
Zvonimir Ankovic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
and
Boris Burgstaller, Rainer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
An unusual treatement of the dance of the
seven veils was also one hallmark of the new production of Strauss’s opera Salome theat premiered at the Deutsche
Oper am Rhein in Duisburg on 8 Nov 2009. This interpretation of the opera by
director Tatjana Gürbaca (which later travelled to Düsseldorf and will be
playing again in April 2010), seems to have been a victim of the German Regietheater and like the |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SALOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Musical Direction:
Christian Badea |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Besides Wilde, the most prevalent authors
from the fin de siècle on German stages were once again Ibsen and Hauptmann.
Apart from them I think I should mention that more and more plays based on
works by Thomas Mann are being produced on German stages, with three
productions of a drama version of Buddenbrooks
produced in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conference
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To end, let me come to something (almost)
completely different. Even though the focus in my letters is usually on
Wilde, I usually also write about books and theatre productions concerning
the literature and culture at the turn of the nineteenth century that are not
primarily associated with symbolist and decadent traits. I therefore should
mention a conference on the topic of Der
Kaiser und die Künste [The Emperor and the Arts], which took place in
Düsseldorf from 3-5 December 2009. The conference tried to shine a light at
various arts in Wilhelmine |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Well, this is it for this time. As usual,
I hope that you and the readers of THE OSCHOLARS will find something interesting
and useful in my letter. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All the best, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lucia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rita Severi |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Two items from 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On January 26, 2009, at 9 p.m., the third
channel of the Italian radio (RadioRai 3), especially dedicated to cultural
events, aired the broadcast of Wilde’s De
Profundis, interpreted by the actor Paolo Bonacelli, according to the new
translation by Masolino D’Amico. The reading, directed by Riccardo Massai,
was introduced by Antonio Audino and discussed by the translator and Paolo Orlandelli. Paolo Bonacelli proposed this expressive
and successful reading again at the Festival dei Due Mondi in Spoleto, on
Saturday and Sunday, 11-12 July, 2009, in San Nicolò and on July 26, at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On Thursday, August 6 2009, in the
splendid setting of the Renaissance centre of Carpi (about 15 km from
Modena), Italy, the performing artist, Carlo Sabbadini, staged his one-man
parody of Wilde’s Salomé with the
title, Treading Ironically on Oscar
Wilde’s Salomé (Camminata ironica su Salomé di Oscar Wilde). The actor dressed like a
character from one of Beckett’s plays, literally strutting all the time on a
bare stage, delivered the speeches, that he had adapted and translated from
Wilde’s French into the local dialect (carpigiano). The whole play was
up-dated to ridicule the present political situation in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Emily Alder |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
September 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings to the OSCHOLARS from a mild
and sunny Edinburgh September! This is an improvement on the rainy August,
which nonetheless did little to dampen the sparkle of Wilde dramatisations in
the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. Performances included Lady
Windermere’s Fan by amateur dramatics society the Chelsfield
Players, Rocket Theatre’s Oscar Wilde’s Lord Arthur Savile's Crime, and Keith Drinkel’s one-man performance of The Picture of Dorian Gray. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As well as direct adaptations and new
productions, the characteristic Fringe range of comic twists and cameo
appearances of literary figures sallied forth in Vice Versa’s gender-swapping The Importance of Being
Earnestina, and Poet’s
Corner by Tea for Ten Theatre Company: in Westminster Abbey, Wilde,
Byron, and other celebrated wordsmiths “congregate and wile away the
centuries, awaiting the next party”. Reviewed positively, both shows had a
successful run; Oscar Wilde and the Men of the Hour, however, drew poor reviews, and it’s possible to see why from the
group’s own Fringe programme description: “History's most fearsome and
celebrated authors join forces to travel time and bring smite to the schemes
of the diabolical Time Nazis”. Case rests! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other fin-de-siècle
shows included no fewer than two versions of Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s
1892 short story The Yellow Wallpaper:
The Yellow Wallpaper from new
theatre company Ethereal Pants, and ShadyJane’s Her Yellow Wallpaper. Both female leads drew particular
commendation from reviewers. At the other end of the spectrum appeared Robin
Johnson’s Broken Holmes,
“an excellent Holmes pastiche, well-written and performed, and worthy to be
remembered as one of the better attempts to capture this literary giant”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Festival season over, more regular
theatricals resume, albeit taking a break from Wilde. Dundee Rep’s production
of The Cherry Orchard has just
finished a three-week run; ‘a production,’ writes The Guardian, ‘that chimes
with our own recessionary times in which the formerly well-off are the least
equipped to contemplate the future.’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In July, the 33rd annual conference of the International Association for
the Study of Irish Literatures at the University of Glasgow featured an array
of papers on Wilde, especially engaging with his international circulation:
“The Japanese Reception of Oscar Wilde: Comedy and Tragedy”, from Maho Hidaka
of Seisen University, Japan; “A ‘First-Rate Theatrical Fashion Article’:
Trading Wilde in the Fin-de-Siècle Viennese Literary Marketplace” by Sandra
Mayer, University of Vienna, Austria; and “Contemporary Chinese Rereadings of
Oscar Wilde’s The Happy Prince”,
by our own Linda Wong, Hong Kong Baptist University. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
W. B. Yeats also figured on the programme
in “The Hybrid Late Masks of W.B. Yeats (1865-1939) and Kostes Palamas
(1859-1943): A Comparative Approach”, from Konstantina Georganta, University
of Glasgow. The full abstracts are also
available. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I also draw the OSCHOLARS’ attention to
two events, which sadly I was unable to attend: in mid-October, Professor
Andrew Murphy of the University of St. Andrews gave his inaugural lecture: The Poet and the Professor: W.B. Yeats,
Edward Dowden and the Meanings of Culture. Finally, if not in Scotland,
then at least on a Scottish writer, A Wormwood
Afternoon in Carlton-in-Coverdale, North Yorkshire, featured a
talk by Paul M. Chapman on "The
Decadent Dr Doyle" on 10 October, “an exploration of the often
overlooked Nineties elements in Conan Doyle's work”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I look forward to reporting again. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Yours, as always, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Emily |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
23 September 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BEING TALKED ABOUT: CONFERENCES & CALLS FOR PAPERS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Here we now only note Calls for Papers or
articles specifically relating to Wilde or his immediate circles. The more general list has its own page,
updated every month; to reach it, please click |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ireland, Modernism and the fin de siècle : Symposium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
16th–17th
April 2010, Mary Immaculate College Limerick |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Plenary speakers: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prof.
Lyn Pykett, University of Aberystwyth ; Prof. Adrian Frazier, NUI Galway |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ø FOR
ABSTRACTS OF THE PAPERS, CLICK HERE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theatre of Oscar Wilde
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Société Française d’Etudes
Victoriennes et Edouardiennes (http://www.sfeve.paris4.sorbonne.fr/)
has invited contributions for issue number 72 (October 2010) of its journal Les Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
(http://www.cervec.org/) devoted to the Theatre of Oscar Wilde, edited by Marianne Drugeon, @. The Call for Papers is closed. More information will be published by us
when we have it. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OSCAR IN POPULAR CULTURE / WILDE AS UNPOPULAR CULTURE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
One of the more unlikely readers of Wilde
: in the film Tyson (2008, dir.
James Toback), the boxer Mike Tyson recites from ‘The Ballad of Reading
Gaol’. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lady Windermere’s Fan Dance ?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We take this take this interesting
addition to reception theory from the review by Frances Wilson of Noralee
Frankel: Stripping Gypsy, The Life of
Gypsy Rose Lee. Oxford: Oxford
University Press 2009 (TLS 2nd
October 2009 p.34). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘ “When I lower my gown a faction”,
she purred in her famous set-piece, “A Stripteaser’s Education”, “I am not
interested in your reaction … I am thinking of some painting by Van Gogh or
Susanne [sic] or the charm I had in
reading Lady Windermere’s Fan”. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alcohol taken in sufficient quantities (5):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In De
Profundis, Wilde refers to Dagonet 1880 as Bosie’s favourite
champagne. This would appear to be
Lucien Dagonet et Fils, a Boursault vineyard so obscure that our Paris caviste, who specialises in
champagnes, had never heard of it. An
internet search has yielded an address, and we will pursue the subject. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sitting room ?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oscar Wilde's ‘The Selfish Giant’ in the form of an armchair by artist Hannah Chapman. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hannah
Chapman ‘The selfish giant’. Recycled
armchair. Upholstered felt, 100%
cotton |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ms
Chapman sends us the following: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello, my name is Hannah Chapman. I
am a UK illustrator who recently graduated from Camberwell College of Arts,
London. I am currently living and working as a Textile Designer in Hong Kong.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am interested in image and
function. I like to play with what is and what could be. I use illustration
to create communicative images, objects, furnishings and environments. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
During the final year of my degree I
was commissioned to redesign and re-brand ‘No.10 The Sandwich Shop’. It was
during this time I developed a strong interest in functional illustration;
considering and translating the needs and communicative aspects of an object
or space. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The ‘Selfish giant chair’ came from a
sudden love for reading all things Oscar Wilde. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘Years went over, and the Giant grew very old
and feeble. He could not play about any more, so he sat in a huge armchair,
and watched the children at their games, and admired his garden. 'I have many
beautiful flowers,' he said; 'but the children are the most beautiful flowers
of all.' |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After spending a summer working and
learning at a traditional upholsters in my hometown my mind began to run away
with what I could create. I began to sketch ideas down and ended up with the
idea of creating the selfish giant as he is in the story, bound to his
armchair. Unfortunately due to a sudden move from London to Hong Kong this
piece is yet to be finished. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I hope to create and show the piece
as a functional installation. I feel it is important for the work to be shown
in a social environment, café, library etc… A place where the piece can act
as part of the furniture but like the book it originally derived from, have a
communicative usability. Surrounded by hung images illustrating the rest of
the story I hope to show and share this piece in the near future. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OSCAR WILDE: THE poetic legacy
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Those who have followed our pieces on
‘The Ballad of William Bloat’ will welcome this biographical note on its
author, kindly written for us by his son. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Origins of The Ballad of William Bloat. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peter
Calvert. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Raymond Calvert was born on 30th October
1906 at Banchory House, Helen's Bay, Co Down, where he died on 11th July 1959. His father, William Henderson Calvert, was
a Belfast stockbroker, and his mother, Barbara Calvert formerly Williamson,
was the eldest daughter of the Rev. Dr. Henry McIlree Williamson of Fisherwick. He went to Bangor Grammar School and, at
the age of 16, to Queen's University, Belfast, where he studied English
Literature. While there he wrote a
number of short stories but his main interest was in drama, an interest which
began as a boy when he had met members of the original Ulster Theatre. At Queen's therefore he was a keen member
of the Dramatic Society. It was the
custom on the last night of a production to have a cast supper at which each
member of the cast would make a contribution.
It was for this occasion in 1926 that he composed and first recited The
Ballad of William Bloat. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
He was lucky to survive his final year in
college, having had major health problems and a serious motorcycle accident,
and was only 20 when he graduated in 1927.
In fact he was hardly recovered when he was off to Dublin to gain
experience in the theatre, working both at the Abbey Theatre and with Hilton
Edwards and Micheál MacLíammóir at the Gate.
1928 found him in Cambridge at the Festival Theatre (forerunner of the
Cambridge Arts Theatre). But with the
onset of the Great Depression he was drafted into the family stockbroking
firm, where he worked for the rest of his life, and in 1934 he married. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Of course he continued to write, often in
the middle of the night. In 1936 took
his MA degree at Queen's by a thesis entitled ‘The natural history of
sculptural forms’ which was regarded as of exceptional merit. During and after the War he wrote at least
three radio plays, two of which, ‘On the cliff’ (inspired by the cliffs of
Islandmagee) and ‘I don't pretend to....’ (drawing on his father's interest
in spiritualism), were broadcast in the late 1940s. In the 1950s he gave a number of radio
talks on Belfast life; one on Smithfield Market was much appreciated by those
who worked there. He was slightly
surprised but quite pleased at the continuing popularity of Bloat, and
made sure I was told that it was to be broadcast in the early 1950s as a
recitation in The McCooeys - the local BBC equivalent of The Archers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In 1950 the poem first appeared in print
in an anthology entitled Brave Crack! An Anthology of Ulster Wit and
Humour (Belfast, H.R. Carter
Publications). This is the only version approved by my father for
publication in his lifetime, though he was not too pleased that the words
‘bloody’ and ‘hell’ were then regarded as too risqué to be
spelt out in full. (This, the original
version, was however used by Joe McPartland, ed., in The Ulster Reciter:
Ballads, Poems and Recitations for Every Occasion, Belfast, Blackstaff
Press, 1984, and on this occasion I am glad to say that readers' feelings
were not spared.) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After my father died in 1959, the
copyright had passed to my mother, who continued to receive from time to time
contracts for the use of Bloat from the BBC. As time passed however it became painfully
clear that other people were beginning to forget who wrote it. A surprising number seem to have believed
that it was a traditional ballad, and this came to a head when it was published
without attribution in 1978 by Oxford University Press in The New Oxford
Book of Light Verse edited by Kingsley Amis. Amis, we were told, refused to accept the
fact of its authorship, and though the Press did accept it, rather
reluctantly, it was only to receive credit in a prospective second edition,
by which time the harm was already done.
By contrast, when I wrote on behalf of my mother to the Walt Disney
Corporation about its use without acknowledgement in ‘Dead Poets' Society’
(1989), the result was a personal telephone call from the Vice President with
an immediate offer of a settlement which she accepted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
With the arrival of the internet it
became clear that a second, and more serious, problem was the almost
automatic way in which the text was becoming distorted to fit the political
prejudices of which the original had been a spoof. The problem was the punchline; ‘For the
razor blade was German made/ But the sheet was Irish linen’ It is not
‘Belfast’ linen; linen made in Belfast has always been known as Irish linen;
indeed there was at one stage, I believe, a proposal from the Irish linen
industry to use Bloat in their advertising - perhaps not altogether a
good idea. The razor blade was not
‘Dublin’ made; either, but ‘German’ made, which reflected the standard
prejudices of the time, as well as the fact that my father often chose to
shave with the then already old-fashioned 'cut-throat' razor. However in the new age of European
co-operation in the 1980s, which we both strongly supported, my mother
preferred ‘foreign’ made, and that is the variant she approved for The
Ballad of William Bloat a poem by Raymond Calvert illustrated by Hector
McDonnell (Belfast, The Blackstaff Press, 1982). As she herself said, the point of the
antithesis was, after all, between Irishness and foreignness though I like to
think of it as being between the strength of the soft fabric and the weakness
of cold steel. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© Peter Calvert 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
v For the authentic version of ‘The Ballad of William Bloat’ by
Raymond Calvert, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aamer
Inayatullah, a Pakistani poet and painter, has
studied art and the liberal arts in Pakistan, USA, Italy and France. A figurative painter for many years, he is
currently based in Paris, where he has turned to figurative sculpture. An art critic, he has also written poetry
in several languages. He says, ‘First
love, then look’. Mr Inayatullah is
interested in writing critical responses to poetry, notably that of Wilde,
Lord Alfred Douglas, and Yeats) that themselves take poetic form, and are
intended to be read with the originals.
We feel this to be an |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aamer
Inayatullah writes: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would like to propose a certain
kind of poetry, which would be an appreciation, criticism, creative
reinterpretation etc of a poem. Most
criticism of poetry has been written in prose, and it would be interesting if
this were done in poetry. There is of
course a wide spectrum of how modern poets respond to earlier work, and the
diversity of responses is something to celebrate. In art Mannerism was somewhat akin to my
idea, although it is not an exact example.
However although some of the Mannerists were somewhat tedious, like
Julio Romano, others like Parmaginino attained soaring heights of ‘affected
beauty’. In more modern times Cubism
would not be imaginable without Cezanne, and Mark Rothko said ‘I am coming straight
out of Rembrandt’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thus if this kind of Poetry is
written, it would in some ways as Walter Pater said be ‘The fancy of a
perpetual life, sweeping through ten thousand experiences.’ Needless to say, I do not propose that this
is how all modern poetry should be, but this could be one kind of
poetry. As a suggestion it may be
called Post Alfred Douglas(PAD) poetry, honouring the Carrara marble-like
chiseled quality of his sonnets, or as Mannerism (although this word
historically and even today, has somewhat negative connotations), and so on. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have made some modest efforts in
this respect. For me it was the spontanæous response to the sentiment the
original poem expressed, or reinterpretation, and sometimes taking the story
forward in a different but related context. For example in ‘Les Tuileries
Jardins’, I imagined an imaginary meeting of Oscar and his children during
the former’s exile. My sonnets are a
liberal interpretation of the sonnet form, the context being they are written
in post-modern 2008. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would be happy know the comments and
criticism of the readers to my idea, and to my sonnets. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a)
Sonnet to Oscar’s
‘Endymion’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Oh! Apple trees are hung with bees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
b)
Sonnet to Oscar’s ‘Les
Tuileries Jardins’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When winter air is cold to bear |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web Foot Notes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A look at websites of possible
interest. Contributions welcome here
as elsewhere. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All the material that we had thus far
published in the ‘Web Foot Notes’ was brought together in June 2003 in one
list called ‘Trafficking for Strange Webs’.
A Table of Contents has been added for ease of access. ‘New websites continue to be reviewed here
from time to time, after which they are filed on the Trafficking for Strange
Webs page, which was last updated in May 2008: a new update will be completed
this month. Trafficking for Strange
Webs’ surveys 48 websites devoted to Oscar Wilde. The Société Oscar Wilde is also
publishing on its webpages two lists (‘Liens’ and ‘Liaisons’) of
recommendations, updated in December 2009 and in January 2010 respectively. To see ‘Liens’, click here. To see ‘Liaisons’, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OGRAPHIES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We continue to expand our sections of
BIBLIOGRAPHIES, DISCOGRAPHIES and SCENOGRAPHIES and this is now a major
component of our work. A FILMOGRAPHY
is now being constructed. Click the
appropriate icons. Updates are
announced regularly on our forum. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catulle Mendès
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noelle Benhamou is compiling a
bibliography of sources on Catulle Mendès.
Please contact her @ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mad, Scarlet Music
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our regular feature concerning
Wilde-related music covers productions, recordings and reviews of the Wilde
operas, cantatas, orchestral suites, musical comedies and ballets, to which
we add information about other musical works of Wilde’s period or derived
from its literature. From Strauss’ Salome and Zemlinsky’s Florentine Tragedy to Oliver Rudland’s
The Nightingale and the Rose and
Elizabeth Esris’ and Sergio Cervetti’s Elegy
for a Prince, we gather all the materials for a major study of Wilde’s
impact on composers. Mad, Scarlet
Music is edited by Tine Englebert. For the current edition, click |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NEVER SPEAKING DISRESPECTFULLY: THE OSCAR WILDE
SOCIETIES & ASSOCIATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
News of the Wilde Societies is published
on their own page. We are very pleased
that we now carry news of the Oscar Wilde Society of Japan. To reach the page, please click |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE OSCHOLARS COLOUR SUPPLEMENT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Readers of our sister journal RUE DES
BEAUX ARTS will be familiar with its long running strip cartoon on Oscar
Wilde by Patrick Chambon. In the issue of November 2008 this was
joined by a new strip by Dan Pearce,
translated into French (as Oscar Wilde: La
Resurrection) by Danielle Guérin. With this issue of THE OSCHOLARS we publish the third episode in English (as Oscar
Wilde: The Second Coming). Click the
illustration to take up the tale: |
Pictured: The original door of cell
C.3.3, Reading Gaol, now part of the H.M. Prison Service Collection housed at
the Galleries of Justice, Nottingham |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Our plan is eventually to bring all three
strips into one folder, where they can be read straight through as graphic
novels. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a Bibliography of Wilde in graphic
novel form compiled by Danielle Guérin, click here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OUR FAMILY OF JOURNALS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All our journals appear on our website www.oscholars.com
and can be reached from our hub page at that address. All of them invite submissions. Each has a mailing list for alerts to new
issues or special announcements. To be
included on the list for any or all of them, contact oscholars@gmail.com.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Eighth Lamp
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The second issue of this journal of Ruskin studies has been published on our
website, under the vigorous editorship of Anuradha Chatterjee. THE EIGHTH LAMP: Ruskin Studies To-day
will shed much light in new places, and puts Ruskin studies firmly in
conjugation with Wilde studies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Latchkey
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The first two issues of THE LATCHKEY, a journal devoted to reporting and creating scholarship on
The New Woman, were published in the spring and autumn of 2009, and a new
edition will be ready this spring. The
editor is Petra Dierkes-Thrun and
the reviews editor is Jessica Cox. Co-editors
are Sharon Bickle, Sophie Geoffroy, Lisa Hager, Christine Huguet, Claire O’Callaghan and Sarah
Townley. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Melmoth
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Edited by Sondeep Kandola, two issues of this journal of late Victorian Gothic appeared within THE
OSCHOLARS main editorial section. The
third issue floated free. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Michaelian
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the first journal to be dedicated to Michael Field, marking the
growing interest in that remarkable couple and was published in the spring of
2009. The first issue was edited by Sharon Bickle, and the second will be
edited by Michelle Lee, spring
2010. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ravenna
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This new journal, intended to appear
twice a year, is devoted to the Italian fin-de-siècle and decadenza, with particular emphasis on
the British connection. It is edited
by Elisa Bizzotto and Luca Caddia, and the first numbers
appeared in spring and autumn 2009.
Articles are accepted in both English and Italian, in the latter case
with an English précis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rue des Beaux Arts
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The twenty-fifth issue of our French
language journal under the dedicated
editorship of Danielle Guérin was
published in March 2010. It continues
to reflect and encourage Wilde studies in France and the Francophone
countries. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shavings, Moorings and The Sibyl
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
New issues of these journals devoted to George Bernard Shaw, George Moore,, and Vernon Lee (edited by Sophie Geoffroy) are published as
material is accumulated. We recommend joining their mailing list for alerts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visions and Nocturne
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the spring of 2008 we gathered
together all the visual arts information that was scattered through different
section of THE OSCHOLARS into a new journal called VISIONS.
This was consolidated in the summer, and a new edition was published
in the autumn followed by further issues in spring and summer 2009. A new issue was published in January 2010. VISIONS is co-edited by Anne Anderson, Isa Bickman, Tricia Cusack, Nicola Gauld, Tamara Poniatowska, Charlotte
Ribeyrol and Sarah Turner. NOCTURNE, our journal devoted to Whistler
and his circle, is now being incorporated into VISIONS. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acknowledgments
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
THE OSCHOLARS website continues to be provided and
constructed by Steven Halliwell of The
Rivendale Press, a publishing house with a special interest in the
fin-de-siècle. Mr Halliwell joins Dr
John Phelps of Goldsmiths College, University of London, and Mr
Patrick O’Sullivan of the Irish Diaspora Net as one of the godfathers
without whom THE OSCHOLARS could
not have appeared on the web in any useful form. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Return to Table of Contents |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Eastham |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Teaching
Aestheticism at M.A. level
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
‘Aestheticism and Decadence in Victorian Culture’
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Teaching Aestheticism at BA level comes
with its frustrations. Dorian Gray
might appear on the Victorian core course, but will we really have time to
give students the necessary intellectual backgrounds for the ideas that Lord
Henry is pedaling so artfully and Basil Hallward is living by so earnestly?
How will we account for the transformation of Pater’s Hellenism into
fin-de-siècle Decadence if students are little aware of the key intellectual
currents of C19? Aside from the difficulty of giving a real sense of Pater
beyond the ‘hard gem like flame’, it’s near to impossible to give any
meaningful sense of Schiller and Hegel, Gautier and Baudelaire, Ruskin and
Morris, and Whistler and Wilde in a lecture. And how will we attend to
critical and literary works which invariably establish new relationship
between literature, painting, music and philosophy without exposing students
to all these forms? Part of the challenge in teaching Aestheticism is that
many of its most important texts are more theoretically charged than they at
first seem. Many readers fail to see beyond the ornamented parataxis of ‘The
School of Giorgione’ to appreciate its complexity as a statement about the
relations between artistic media. At the same time we need to be careful
about overburdening a movement which promoted sensuous play and intellectual
freedom with dogmatic theoretical or historical contexts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideally, there will be space for
considering intellectual and historical contexts alongside close reading that
allows more than a week per text. In British higher education, this is often
impossible. But I’m going to begin this thread with an account of a teaching
experience which allowed an unusually broad space for a proper study of
Aestheticism, its background and legacies. This was an MA course I taught at
Royal Holloway, London, which gave me the opportunity of setting a syllabus
on Aestheticism over two semesters. I took over what was previously a team
taught course structured in 4 parts; an initial block focusing on Ruskin,
Pater and Morris, a second block on ‘Aesthetic Poetry’, from Tennyson and
Swinburne to Michael Field, a third section dedicated to Wilde, and a fourth
section focusing on the New Woman, Aestheticism and Decadence. I redesigned
the course so that the first semester provided a historical survey of British
Aestheticism, beginning with Ruskin and ending in Wilde, with a strong
emphasis on Pater and Wilde. Readers of the Oscholars might find this Wildean
telos satisfying, but the second semester complicated and in many ways
refuted such a narrative. Already harping on haunted portraits, we went
forward to James’s Wings of a Dove,
and this gothic representation of feminine isolation and aesthetic autonomy
sent us back to Rossetti’s ‘A Portrait’ and Tennyson’s ‘The Palace of Art’,
then further back to Gautier’s Mademoiselle
de Maupin, where the gender trouble at the origins of Aestheticism was
revealed. Following Gautier’s exquisite romance on performativity, artifice
and sexual panic, we gave proper space to Baudelaire’s poetry, the necessary
path to understanding British decadence, as well as the ekphrastic and
synaesthetic projects of writers from Swinburne to Arthur Symons and Michael
Field. The final phase of this course covered the New Woman in Aestheticism,
and the return of the Gothic, with specific reference to Vernon Lee. The aim
was to finish with a recognition of the continuing presence of Aestheticism
in the Contemporary. First, in aesthetic theory, we would look at Jaques
Rancière’s brilliant recapitulations of the project of aesthetic idealism,
one of the rare examples of continental aesthetic thinking that recognizes
the example of the British Aesthetic Movement. Finally, we would read Alan
Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty –
one of a series of texts in the last decade to analyze or revive the idea of
beauty, in this case through a subtle and provocative use of the Victorian
fin de siècle. Alas, even in a full year’s teaching, breadth had to give way
to focus: Rancière and Hollinghurst were dropped, but ultimately we managed
to cover a satisfying range of Victorian material. I’m going to describe in
detail the challenges I experienced in presenting this material and a sense
of what I believe are useful focuses for class discussion. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semester One |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ruskin and the ideal of Gothic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘The Nature of Gothic’ (from Stones of Venice) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. Ruskin
and Baudelaire: Beauty and Modernity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baudelaire: The Painter of Modern Life (I-IV, VIII-XI) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ruskin, extracts from Modern Painters II (Section One,
Chapters 2,5,12: Section Two, Chapter 2), and Fors Clavigera (Letter 52: ‘Vale of Lune’) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. Pater’s
The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘Preface, ‘Winckelmann’, ‘Leonardo da
Vinci’, ‘The Poetry of Michaelangelo’, ‘Conclusion’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
And ‘Diapheneitè’ (from Miscellaneous Studies, or in Appendix
to The Renaissance, OUP) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. Pater:
Aesthetic Subjectivity and the ‘Giorgionesque’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘The School of Giorgione’ (from The Renaissance) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘A Prince of Court Painters’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘The Child in the House’ (handouts) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5. Morris
and Utopian Æstheticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Morris, ‘The Aims of Art’, ‘Useful Work
versus Useless Labour’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pater, ‘Aesthetic Poetry’ (handouts) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6. Reading
Week |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7. Oscar
Wilde’s Aesthetic Criticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘The Decay of Lying’, ‘The Portrait of Mr
W.H.’ (in The Soul of Man under
Socialism, and Selected Critical Prose, ed. Dowling) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8. Wilde:
Dandyism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Picture of Dorian Grey (Penguin) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9. Wilde:
Symbolism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
‘The Critic as Artist’, Salome |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10. Wilde:
Socialism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Soul of Man Under Socialism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11. Wilde:
Social Comedies |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Importance of Being Earnest |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aestheticism and Decadence: Semester 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. Henry James and the legacy of Æstheticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
James, The Wings of a Dove |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2. Aesthetic Poetry 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tennyson, ‘The Palace of Art’, ‘The Lady
of Shallot’, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Browning, ‘My Last Duchess’, ‘Porphyria’s
Lover’, ‘Andrea Del Sarto’, ‘Fra Lippo Lippi’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3. Aesthetic Poetry 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
D.G. Rossetti, Beata Beatrix, ‘The Portrait’, Sonnets from ‘The House of Life’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(esp. ‘Soul’s Beauty’, ‘Body’s Beauty’),
‘Found (For a Picture)’, ‘On a Venetian Pastoral by Giorgione’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
C. Rossetti, ‘Goblin Market’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4. Decadence 1: Gender Trouble and the
Origins of Aestheticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gautier,
Madamoiselle du Maupin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5. Decadence 2:
Aesthetic Vampirism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baudelaire, Les
Fleurs du Mal |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hegel, extract from Introductory Lectures
on Aesthetics (‘The Irony') |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
6. Reading Week |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
7. Victorian Image / Music / Text |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Michael Field, Sight and Sound |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Whistler, Symphony in White No.2, Nocturnes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Swinburne, ‘Before the Mirror’, Mallarmé,
‘Autre Eventail’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Huysmans, extracts from Against Nature (chapter 5) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
8. Decadence 3: Theatricality and London |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arthur Symons, London Nights , ‘At the Alhambra’, ‘The World as Ballet’, ‘The
Decadent Movement in Literature’, ‘London: A Book of Aspects’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
9. The New Woman’s Aesthetic Lives |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vernon Lee, ‘Lady Tal’, George Egerton,
‘A Cross Line’, Victoria Cross, ‘Theodora: A Fragment’, Kate Chopin, ‘An
Egyptian Cigarette’ (in Daughters of
Decadence) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amy Levy, ‘A London Plane Tree and Other
Verse’ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10. The Gothic and the Uncanny |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vernon Lee, Hauntings |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
11. Post-modernism, Neo-Victorianism, and
the End of Aestheticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alan Hollinghurst, The Line of Beauty |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First Semester |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section One: British Æstheticism |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Even at MA level the majority of students
had only encountered Aestheticism according to its ‘greatest hits’ – namely Dorian Gray and Pater’s ‘Conclusion’.
So the literary and cultural history needed establishing. At the same time I
wanted to establish some sense of the tradition of aesthetics that Pater was
working. As such, my introduction covered the key theoretical sources of
Aestheticism. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Necessarily curtailed, I began with
Kant’s idea of beauty as an end-in-itself , Schiller’s promotion of the play drive
and the ‘aesthetic state’, and his vision of the Juno Ludovisi as an image of
absolute freedom – a figure which would haunt the late Victorian period,
reconfigured by Pater as the vampire Mona Lisa. I went on to explain a divide
which I believe is fundamental to late C18 and C19 aesthetic thinking – on
one side the German Romantic ironists, with their belief in literature,
criticism and the fragment as the basis of a sublime freedom; on the other
side, Hegel, whose evolutionary system of aesthetics was directed against the
Romantic ironists. In Hegel’s system, the end point is poetic drama, and in
this sense he was both following Schiller and pre-empting a number of later
C19 thinkers, including Guiseppe Mazzini and Wilde himself, in which drama
was both the highest point of aesthetic evolution and the expression of the
social organism. Establishing this divide makes it easier to clarify how
arguments about specific artistic media were often linked to the political
dimensions of Victorian Aesthetic thinking. It also sets up a tension between
organicism and individualism which was crucial to the increasing divide
between Ruskin and Pater. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
These different contexts were transmitted
to British Aestheticism via Oxford Hellenism and French Decadence. For a brief
narrative of transmission, Gautier is an obvious starting point. We would be
covering Mademoiselle du Maupin later
in the course, so this was a point to mention the famous preface, with its
assertion that ‘nothing is really beautiful unless it is useless. Everything
useful is ugly, for it expresses a need.’ It was particularly important to
establish this before working on Ruskin, since the divide between Arts and
Crafts and Aestheticism would already be clear. The introductory lecture
covered Wilde’s donning of Gautier’s red waistcoat and its revolutionary
implications, before briefly tracing Gautier’s viral transmission into
British culture through Swinburne and Rossetti. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would have been more contextually
correct to give a proper introduction to Pre-Raphaelitism and the background
to Ruskin at this stage, but there is rarely world enough and time to be
satisfy the current rage for contextual correctness and cover all the
theoretical background that interests me. So I choose to go straight into
Ruskin with this alternative theoretical narrative in mind. Although German
idealist aesthetics may have been anathema to Ruskin, students should
immediately find both extreme contrasts and affinities – organicism, the
ideal of play, and the earnest attempt to think about the systematic
relationship between artistic media and the social function of art. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ruskin’s Stones of Venice was the initial text, and I used the selection
from ‘The Nature of Gothic’ in the Oxford Selected
Writings. This is ample for a discussion of the key ideas; how Ruskin’s
Gothic paves the way for a form of aesthetic individualism through the
rejection of a system or ornamentation and the promotion of the grotesque;
his critique of alienated labour and machinic production; his ideal of aesthetic
education (‘to brighten, to strengthen, to refine, or to form a single living
spirit’); his labour theory of value; the central function of architecture in
his social vision; and his organic idea of the relation between classes.
Unsurprisingly, the discussion of Ruskin focused around the political
tensions in his work, and at this point I introduced Linda Dowling’s analysis
of the idea of aesthetic democracy in Victorian Aesthetic prose. (Along with
Jonathan Freedman on James and Aestheticism, Regenia Gagnier on Wilde, and
Kathy Psomiades on Victorian Poetry, this would be one of the critical texts
I most frequently recommended). It was only after an argument about Ruskin’s
politics had developed that I mentioned Ruskin’s grouchy self-identification as
a ‘violent Tory of the old-school’, which was received as both a shock and a
confirmation. In one sense, this set up Ruskin as a straw dog to contrast
with liberal cosmopolitan Aestheticism, but there was an aspect of the Gothic
that would recur throughout the course; one student picked up on the
‘restlessness’ that was intrinsic to the Gothic sensibility, and this word
would be echoed in diverse texts by Pater, Gautier and Vernon Lee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the second week we maintained the
focus on Ruskin briefly, using sections from Modern Painters II in order to frame a contrast with Baudelaire’s
ideas about beauty and modernity. This is the most turgid of Ruskin’s prose:
I set this piece because Ruskin’s ideas about aesthesis and theoria might
provide an interesting contrast with Baudelaire’s aesthetic impressionism,
but the selections understandably fell flat, and in future I will confine
this part of Modern Painters to my
introductory comments. I Introduced The Painting of Modern Life with a
Power-point presentation called ‘Spectators of Modern Life’. This began with
a contrast between Millais’ portrait of Ruskin and Carjat’s Baudelaire, with
a discussion of their different relationships to realism and modernity,
before moving on to introduce French impressionism and the conditions of
spectatorship. I compared Caspar David Friedrich’s ‘Wanderer above the Mists’
with Caillebotte’s ‘Young Man at his Window’ to suggest the ways that the
Romantic ideal of the sublime spectator had been domesticated and urbanized.
We went on to look at balcony paintings by Caillebotte and Manet, theatrical
interiors such as Renoir’s ‘La Loge’ and Cassatt’s ‘Woman in Black at the
Opera’ and Degas’s ‘Woman with a Lorgnette’. This reflection on spectatorship
culminated in a discussion of Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and ‘A Bar at the Follies
Bergeres’, where I largely followed T.J.Clarke’s argument about Manet’s
reflexive form. Finally we arrived at Baudelaire through Constantin Guys’
etchings, asking why Baudelaire choose these rough sketches of a journalistic
illustrator as his model of modernity. Its important to establish the model
of aesthetic subjectivity that British Aestheticism inherited from Baudelaire
at this point, and looking at the sections on ‘Dandyism’ and ‘Woman’ we
discussed the relationship between his aristocratic model of ironic
detachment and the promotion of absolute artifice. Baudelaire’s curious
combination of decadent misogyny and a Schillerian promotion of free
semblance would be echoed throughout the course, particularly in texts by
Gautier, Wilde and Symons. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baudelaire’s focus on the subjectivity
and evanescence of the aesthetic impression were a crucial link to Pater, and
particularly to the ‘Preface’ and ‘Conclusion’ of The Renaissance. The focus in the first week on Pater was the
contrast between the dark late-Romanticism of ‘Leonardo da Vinci’ and the
Hegelian Hellenism of ‘Winckelmann’. I believe in d’Hangest’s assertion that
Baudelaire and Hegel are the two most important intellectual contexts for an
appreciation of Pater’s aesthetics, and I spent some time introducing Hegel’s
Aesthetics as a background to ‘Winckelmann’. The details of Hegel’s system
are not often taught, but permeate the work of Pater and Symonds, and
consequently Wilde, as Smith and Helfand demonstrate in their edition of the Oxford Notebooks. The system has two
crucial dimensions – an evolutionary historical narrative and a systematic
theory of media. Gautier, Pater, Symonds and Wilde all follow the idea that
art progressed from the Symbolic mode of Oriental art, where sensuous form is
neglected for transcendental aspirations, to the Classical mode of Greek
sculpture, where art found its highest moment of sensuous beauty. When I
outlined Hegel’s narrative of the overcoming of the Classical in the Romantic
mode I stressed its relevance to Decadent Aestheticism - Hegel narrates a fall into precisely the
kind of subjectivism that Pater evokes in his account of Leonardo. One of the
students pointed out, very astutely, that Hegel’s Romantic mode basically
re-instated the problem of the Symbolic – once again, art experienced an
estrangement between sensuous form and spirit. I found this perception a
delightful surprise, since I expected Hegel’s dry system to fall on deaf
ears; by now, the difference between BA and MA teaching was becoming very
clear to me. In the discussion of ‘Leonardo’ we picked up on the resonances
with Baudelaire’s flaneur, focusing on Pater’s miniature narrative, where
Leonardo roams the streets of Florence ‘catching glimpses’ of uncommon beauty;
‘some infusion of the extremes of terror and beauty’. (I would note later
that Wilde recycles this narrative subtly in his account of Dorian’s urban
wanderings immediately after his Decadent conversion.) In this discussion one
student was particularly fascinated by Pater’s construction of Leonardo’s
development through a kind of aesthetic via negativa; ‘for the way to
perfection is through a series of disgusts’. This allowed us to focus on the
model of bildung that emerges from
Pater’s life-narratives. I focused the discussion around the inevitable
ekphrasis of La Giaconda and asked what model of personal development this
suggested. I had recently been writing about vampirism in Aestheticism, so I
introduced my idea that the vampire is a model for condition of Romantic
irony that was both promoted and suffered by the Aesthete– a simultaneously
abject and exquisite condition of detachment. The students would eventually
weary of my harping on vampires, but I would say that here that the recent
film of Dorian missed a great
opportunity to follow this contemporary obsession and introduce vampires into
the story; such sensational ploys might have gone some ways to ameliorating
its bizarre omission of much of Wilde’s brilliant dialogue. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The second week on Pater was focused
around ‘The School of Giorgione’; my intention was to compare this with the
evocative and often neglected imaginary portrait, ‘The Prince of Court
Painters’, which is in many easy a melancholy meditation on the aesthetics of
‘The School of Giorgione’, but much of the seminar was taken up by a
discussion of Pater’s theory of media. Initially I framed 1877 as a
transitional moment in the history of Aestheticism; Pater’s essay was
published in the same year as Grant Allen’s Physiological Aesthetics, when the Grosvenor Gallery opened, and
Whistler served his writ to Ruskin. I explained the links with Whistler and
gave a power-point presentation outlining Whistler’s move towards musical
abstraction, from ‘Symphony in White’ series to the ‘Nocturnes’. Maintaining
this focus on the interface between music and painting, I then switched to
the Renaissance and spent some time focusing on Pater’s primary contexts;
Titian’s Concert and the Fête Champêtre. The Pitti Concert is a great painting to analyze
in class and a good way in to Pater’s theory of media. I referred to Michael
Fried’s well-worked dichotomy between theatricality and absorption to address
the tension between Pater’s dramatic or performative reading of the painting
and his emphasis on musical absorption. The experience of space in the
painting is particularly important here, since Titian’s landscapes hint at
the fact that music is the one art that invisibly fills the space we inhabit,
whilst at the same time touching us with the force of the soundwave. I argued
polemically that the condition of music as an invisible waveform makes it the
most ideal of the arts, and this started a debate about the relative status
of the various arts. The argument was quite heated at times and produced a
diversity of assertive claims for different media – notably dance, drama and
poetry. Finally, to question our received system of the arts, I asked what
claims might be made for perfume (this does feature in ‘The School of
Giorgione’ in an interest way). Could there be an olefactory art that might
develop to the sophistication of music, if the appropriate technologies were
available? Meant as a provocation, of course, this leads back to Physiological Aesthetics, and in
future classes I might conduct a debate between Allen’s Darwinian theory of
aesthetic evolution and Pater’s unapologetic insistence on the highest
refinement of the aesthetic sense in modernity. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The final week of this section of the
course focused the question of aesthetic modernity and its discontents through
William Morris’s lectures during and after his conversion to Utopian
Socialism. I set these alongside Pater’s review of Morris’s ‘The Earthly
Paradise’ so as to examine the contrast between Pater’s spectral idea of
aesthetic utopia and Morris’s dogmatic insistence on the overcoming of the
autonomous arts. I must confess to a difficulty in teaching Morris here,
since whilst I sympathise with his utopian socialism, I find great limits in
his response to aesthetic modernity, by which I mean the separation of the
artistic media, the emancipation of form from social or devotional context,
and the detachment of the ‘aesthetic’ as a category of experience. This makes
me a poor teacher of these works. Many of the students found the same
limitations in Morris’s lectures, and one astutely articulated the way that
Morris’s rejection of aesthetic autonomy effectively sacrifices the
production of ‘art’ as we know it. In retrospect he would have been better
served by an expert who could lecture on the relation between Morris’s
decorative work and his socialism, and the development of Arts and Crafts. In
future I will most likely abandon contextual accuracy and set Morris’s
lectures alongside passages from Marx’s ‘1844 Manuscripts’ here. Granted they
were not published till long after Morris’s death, but they give a much
sharper intellectual focus to the idea of alienated labour. Marx’s vision of
the estrangement of the sense and ‘species being’ would provide a powerful
focus for the comparison between Ruskin, Morris and Pater, as well as
providing a theoretical framework for thinking about Wilde’s Aesthetic
Socialism. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section Two: Wilde
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Many of the important intellectual
contexts for Wilde’s work were available to students after the first section
of the course, and I began with works that carried the ideas of C19
Aestheticism in the most provocative forms. Rather than setting the aesthetic
dialogues together I grouped ‘The Decay of Lying’ with ‘The Portrait of Mr
W.H.’. I prefaced this by an introduction to Wilde’s earlier lectures and
essays, with a focus on the way that he promoted drama as an ideal art form.
The review of ‘Langtry as Hester Grazebrook’ is a useful short context here,
since it shows how Wilde was using the discourse of Hegelian Hellenism –
under the influence of Pater’s ‘Winckelmann’ and Symonds’s Studies in Greek Poetry – specifically
to celebrate the art of acting. At the same time, we could say he is merely
using the conventional motifs of journalistic flattery – the image of the
actress as moving sculpture is both a key tenet of Hegel’s Aesthetics and a standard motif of C19
theatre criticism. ‘The Decay of Lying’ and ‘The Portrait of Mr W.H.’ both
state a more serious theory of drama as the ideal art, raising it from the
dangers of contemporary realism, but they are also fraught with the
difficulties of idealising an essentially mimetic medium. In teaching Wilde’s
critical prose I choose to focus on the problems of mimesis – both in terms
of artistic media and personal self-fashioning. I asked students to compare
Wilde’s ideal personality – the actor Willie Hughes – with the ‘beautiful
exotic woman’ whose tragic mimetic compulsion Vivian narrates in ‘The Decay
of Lying’. The gendering of the mimetic personality is also worth discussing
here, and can be revisited in the discussions of Dorian and Salome, as
well as in later texts by Vernon Lee and George Egerton. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is difficult to choose between the
many ways of providing a theoretical context for these issues around mimesis
and identity; there are numerous articles in late Victorian journalism
concerned with the value of imitation in learning or the dangers of
compulsive mimicry. By the fin de siècle Tarde and Le Bon had made mimesis
the basis of sociology and mass psychology, and in Wilde’s own reading
Herbert Spencer was a precursor to these theorists. In contemporary theory we
could look to Girard’s work on mimetic desire or Derrida’s treatment of
Platonism. I choose to promote Emerson as a crucial context for Wilde,
following Isobel Murray’s emphasis on the Emersonian basis of Wilde’s vision
of character. The key statement here is Emerson’s insistence in the essay on
‘Self Reliance’ to ‘Insist on yourself: Never Imitate’. For North American
students, this seemed to be as familiar as a nursery rhyme, though less so to
British graduates. It is particularly useful in highlighting some of the
larger contradictions of Wilde’s Aesthetic individualism – how can such an
artfully self-fashioned personality, borrowing freely from Nero, Gautier or
the Regency as he pleases, who praises the essentially mimetic art of acting
above all others, reject imitation with such vigour? These questions can equally inform a
discussion of ‘The Soul of Man under Socialism’, where the paradoxical
assertion of Anarchist individualism and Socialist collectivism might be
interestingly addressed in terms of the mimetic or shared aspects of
identity. Most of all they are relevant for a reading of ‘De Profundis’,
where Wilde’s ideal personality is Christ (replacing Willie Hughes). In
future I would teach ‘De Profundis’ here and use Jonathan Dollimore’s
polemical rejection of Wilde’s later concept of character to frame a debate.
Dollimore and others have suggested that ‘Decay’ is the ‘real’ Wilde in so
far as it promotes artifice and irony against nature, whereas ‘De Profundis’
is a regressive move to a ‘depth model of identity’. But the Emersonian
context rather complicates this dogmatic assertion, since ‘Self-Reliance’ is
clearly as present in ‘Decay’ as in ‘De Profundis’. I am attaching a handout
I used to focus a number of these issues around imitation, bildung, the ideal personality, and
the politics of identity in Aestheticism, which also nods back to Pater’s
concept of aesthetic self-development. (*link to file; ‘Aestheticism MA
Individualism handout’) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It might be most interesting to stage
these debates before a reading of Wilde’s fiction and drama, though in this
case we discussed Dorian Gray
immediately after the week on ‘Decay’ and ‘Mr W.H’. One of the questions I
always ask about Dorian is - why
didn’t Wilde centre his narrative from the perspective of Basil Halward, the
tragic artist? Once students begin to think about the bildungsroman that Wilde didn’t
write, many of the key issues about the novel come into focus – the
difficulty in representing homosexual desire (which can now be more easily
taught with reference to the Lippincott’s Dorian),
what is at stake in the issue of artistic impersonality, and once again the
crossing between artistic and personal imitation. I stressed those
fascinating passages where Basil confesses to have found himself in Dorian,
and subsequently faced a crisis around personal independence. This clearly
suggests the Emersonian basis to Aesthetic Hellenism, whilst Henry’s
reflections on Basil’s plight focus the Platonic background (usefully
focused, if there were time, by Derrida’s essay ‘The Double Session’, which
contains a good brief summary of Plato’s concept of mimesis). Dorian is the most accessible text to
most students, so it is important to use this opportunity to focus the wider
movements within the culture of Aestheticism – Basil’s crisis and death
reflects the general shift from Aesthetic Hellenism to Decadence, and
Dorian’s promotion of ceremonial form, insincerity and the artificial
paradise clearly evoke a specifically 90’s formation of aesthetics and
identity (these latter issues are interestingly focused by Alan Ackerman in
his essay from Philip Smith’s recent collection on Approaches to the Teaching of Wilde, which I reviewed in the Oscholars). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Following Dorian, I chose to group together, somewhat perversely, Salome with ‘The Critic as Artist’. My
rather strained rationale behind this was that I believe that ‘Critic’ moves
away from the aesthetic of ‘Decay’ and ‘Mr W.H.’ (where the priority is
dramatic embodiment) towards a Symbolist aesthetic, where drama is now
subsumed within a subjective idea of literary impressionism. This proved to
be too unwieldy and inaccurate a focus of comparison, but the tension between
dramatic embodiment and Symbolism would emerge in the discussion of the Salome. This began with a look at the
play’s shock strategies, such as the sudden changes of register between a
hieratic Symbolist style and the demotic and visceral force of Salome’s
entrance. Salome’s dialogue with Jokanaan was a key focus here, and the main
interpretative question concerned her sudden reversals between spleen and
idealism; was this a sign of hysterical violence or a subtle mimicry and
reversal of the misogynist discourse of Jokanaan and the Symbolist discourse
of Narraboth (as critics such as John-Paul Riquelme and Joseph Donohue have
argued)? The answer to this question depends on how we see Salome’s agency and
relation to power, and this lead to a discussion of Herod and the Roman
state. I proposed Regenia Gagnier’s reading that Salome forces Herod into a
crisis of sovereignty which he has no choice but to overcome. I suggested
Foucault’s ideas about the function of disciplinary spectacle here (see in
particular Discipline and Punish, Penguin
1991, p.48), since Salome stages a
moment in which state power is apparently challenged by sensuous, aesthetic
and erotic demands, only to be restored by a final act of state violence. The
haunting relevance of this conclusion to the general fate of Wilde and
Aestheticism has become increasingly clear to me, and it might be a powerful
future strategy to move directly from Salome
to a consideration of the trial. The structuring of this 5 week section
on Wilde was not entirely successful –‘The Soul of Man’ would have been
better grouped with the earlier essays, and an immediate transition from Salome to The Importance of Being Earnest would have had two benefits.
First, it would have clarified the shock of Wilde’s move away from a hieratic
form of poetic drama, and second, it would have carried the Foucauldian ideas
about discipline and power into the discussion of Earnest. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The issue of how earnest should we make
our discussion of Earnest is
broached in Philip E. Smith’s collection: in this case pre-Christmas mince
pies and wine challenged my attempts to orchestrate an earnest discussion of
Wilde’s strategy of absolute artifice and irony. From an earnest perspective,
Earnest might be seen as a betrayal
of all the values of Aesthetic Hellenism and Emersonian Individualism, a
depthless play with surface which reveals the arbitrariness of language and
performative, but from the perspective of post-modern Wildeans, this is precisely
its value. The questions I asked to focus these issues started with the ways
that reality was constructed in the play; how are privacy and publicity
configured (through the construction of double identities and the status of
Cecily’s diary), and what, if anything, anchors reality so as to prevent
absolute play? A number of students felt that Earnest offered a king of Schillerian synthesis of Aestheticism
and post-modernism here, in the sense that they saw the depthless play of
signifiers as a utopian sign, paradoxically consistent with the vision of
‘The Soul of Man’. This was perhaps a charming idea to carry towards the
Christmas festivities, but as an alternative I proposed a negative version of
Bakhtin’s carnivalesque; that Earnest allowed
a free play of desire and identity within the limits of an authority figured
in Lady Bracknell, whose amusing grotesquery revealed both the arbitrariness
and the persistence of this authority. This is essentially to read Earnest according to the ‘festive’
idea of Shakespearean comedy. If sobriety had allowed this reading to be
pursued more coherently, it might have been focused by a comparison with
Gautier’s Mademoiselle du Maupin, where
the festive form of As you Like It
allows for the most exquisite play of masks and desires. But there would be
time for this in the following semester, when Gautier would establish the
path towards the Decadent masque, and Ruskin’s vision of Gothic Venice would
be replaced by James’s vision of Milly Theale’s consumptive Venetian idyll. Wilde
would haunt the next semester, and even when many of his ruses were revealed
as clever pieces of mimicry, his unique performance of Aestheticism might
still be read as a culminating moment of a long history, just as Dorian saw
himself in the hall of his ancestral portraits. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||